Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758006Ab0AOSxO (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:53:14 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757588Ab0AOSxM (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:53:12 -0500 Received: from outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com ([67.222.54.6]:33389 "HELO outbound-mail-313.bluehost.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1754052Ab0AOSxL (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:53:11 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=virtuousgeek.org; h=Received:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Identified-User; b=rr0I3IZ/OuJudnw0ml3zgd1ESZduFBVVy5NXxCGaCwJUxExYXRfXjtGkCAsbDyOYyDX6II2w1Bqndy3CNSoaqwXGGxQX7CHcZeXYc7D1qJSh/0GJp6ZxEYBlnDYseP5i; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 10:53:05 -0800 From: Jesse Barnes To: Yinghai Lu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Linus Torvalds , Ivan Kokshaysky , Kenji Kaneshige , Alex Chiang , Bjorn Helgaas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Yinghai Lu Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/14] pci: add pci_bridge_release_unused_res and pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res Message-ID: <20100115105305.400cda90@jbarnes-piketon> In-Reply-To: <1261522954-12591-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> References: <1261522954-12591-1-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> <1261522954-12591-4-git-send-email-yinghai@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.18.3; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Identified-User: {10642:box514.bluehost.com:virtuous:virtuousgeek.org} {sentby:smtp auth 75.111.28.251 authed with jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org} Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:02:23 -0800 Yinghai Lu wrote: > +static void pci_bridge_release_unused_res(struct pci_bus *bus, > + unsigned long type) > +{ > + int idx; > + bool changed = false; > + struct pci_dev *dev; > + struct resource *r; > + unsigned long type_mask = IORESOURCE_IO | IORESOURCE_MEM | > + IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; > + > + dev = bus->self; > + for (idx = PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCES; idx <= > PCI_BRIDGE_RESOURCE_END; > + idx++) { > + r = &dev->resource[idx]; > + if ((r->flags & type_mask) != type) > + continue; > + if (!r->parent) > + continue; > + /* > + * if there are children under that, we should > release them > + * all > + */ > + release_child_resources(r); > + if (!release_resource(r)) { > + dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG, &dev->dev, > + "resource %d %pR released\n", idx, > r); > + /* keep the old size */ > + r->end = resource_size(r) - 1; > + r->start = 0; > + r->flags = 0; > + changed = true; > + } > + } > + > + if (changed) { > + if (type & IORESOURCE_PREFETCH) { > + /* avoiding touch the one without PREF */ > + type = IORESOURCE_PREFETCH; > + } > + __pci_setup_bridge(bus, type); > + } > +} Isn't this freeing resources regardless of whether there are children? If so, shouldn't it just be called pci_bridge_release_resources? > + > +/* > + * try to release pci bridge resources that is from leaf bridge, > + * so we can allocate big new one later > + * check: > + * 0: only release the bridge and only the bridge is leaf > + * 1: release all down side bridge for third shoot > + */ > +static void __ref pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res(struct pci_bus > *bus, > + unsigned long > type, > + int check_leaf) > +{ > + struct pci_dev *dev; > + bool is_leaf_bridge = true; > + > + list_for_each_entry(dev, &bus->devices, bus_list) { > + struct pci_bus *b = dev->subordinate; > + if (!b) > + continue; > + > + switch (dev->class >> 8) { > + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS: > + is_leaf_bridge = false; > + break; > + > + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI: > + default: > + is_leaf_bridge = false; > + if (!check_leaf) > + pci_bus_release_unused_bridge_res(b, > type, > + check_leaf); > + break; > + } > + } > + > + /* The root bus? */ > + if (!bus->self) > + return; > + > + switch (bus->self->class >> 8) { > + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_CARDBUS: > + break; > + > + case PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI: > + default: > + if ((check_leaf && is_leaf_bridge) || !check_leaf) > + pci_bridge_release_unused_res(bus, type); > + break; > + } > +} Naming comment applies here too. I'd also rather see the "check_leaf" flag be an enum, that makes the callers more self documenting. The enums should probably be called "leaf_only" and "whole_subtree" or similar , since the function will only release the resources of a leaf bridge when the former is passed, while the whole bridge and its subtree will be released in the latter case. This is starting to look a bit easier to follow though, thanks for your patience so far. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/