Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:01:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:01:24 -0400 Received: from bitmover.com ([192.132.92.2]:17087 "EHLO bitmover.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 19:01:23 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 16:01:21 -0700 From: Larry McVoy To: "M. R. Brown" Cc: James Simmons , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux console project Subject: Re: [Linux-fbdev-devel] Fbdev Bitkeeper repository Message-ID: <20020416160121.B24069@work.bitmover.com> Mail-Followup-To: Larry McVoy , "M. R. Brown" , James Simmons , Linux Fbdev development list , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux console project In-Reply-To: <20020416225752.GA5897@0xd6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Please tell us that primary framebuffer/input/console development will > continue in the CVS drop-in tree on SourceForge? Bitkeeper is unable to > support this (easier, more efficient) style of development. Could you please explain why you think CVS is easier and more efficient? Last I checked, BK was a superset of CVS, but could be used pretty much identically to CVS if that's what you want. -- --- Larry McVoy lm at bitmover.com http://www.bitmover.com/lm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/