Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:22:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:22:53 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:29709 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 16 Apr 2002 20:22:52 -0400 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Date: 16 Apr 2002 17:22:28 -0700 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1018964120.13527.37.camel@pc-16.office.scali.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2002 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: By author: Alan Cox In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > > I seem to recall from theory that the 100HZ is human dependent. Any > > higher and you would begin to notice delays from you input until > > whatever program you're talking to responds. > > Ultimately its because Linus pulled that number out of a hat about ten years > ago. For some workloads 1KHz is much better, for others like giant number > crunching people actually drop it down to about 5.. > Hardly so. 100 Hz was standard on most commercial Unices around the time the first Linux was done... -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/