Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754513Ab0BAIEN (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:04:13 -0500 Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:59442 "HELO mail.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752534Ab0BAIEK (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 03:04:10 -0500 X-Authenticated: #14349625 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+q0wVNN4mqH4Efimh3u71UBYrv4OpuHLYxRppQ0e WOViP8R9BQeXNc Subject: Re: [Bug #15192] netperf ~50% regression with 2.6.33-rc1, bisect to 1b9508f From: Mike Galbraith To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List , Ingo Molnar , Lin Ming , Peter Zijlstra In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:04:07 +0100 Message-Id: <1265011447.6220.15.camel@marge.simson.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.24.1.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.68000000000000005 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 786 Lines: 19 On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 01:22 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > of recent regressions. > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > from 2.6.32. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > (either way). Yes, it should remain open. We're currently waiting for some data from Lin Ming. The regression itself isn't making much sense.. a kernel with NEWIDLE disabled should show the same performance, but does not. -Mike -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/