Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754559Ab0BANsf (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:48:35 -0500 Received: from THUNK.ORG ([69.25.196.29]:44192 "EHLO thunker.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752023Ab0BANse (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:48:34 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:47:39 -0500 From: tytso@mit.edu To: Andi Kleen Cc: Christoph Lameter , Dave Chinner , Miklos Szeredi , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , Pekka Enberg , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: inodes: Support generic defragmentation Message-ID: <20100201134739.GA4635@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: tytso@mit.edu, Andi Kleen , Christoph Lameter , Dave Chinner , Miklos Szeredi , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Lameter , Rik van Riel , Pekka Enberg , akpm@linux-foundation.org, Nick Piggin , Hugh Dickins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20100129204931.789743493@quilx.com> <20100129205004.405949705@quilx.com> <20100130192623.GE788@thunk.org> <20100131083409.GF29555@one.firstfloor.org> <20100131210207.GA27883@thunk.org> <20100201101702.GH29555@one.firstfloor.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100201101702.GH29555@one.firstfloor.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on thunker.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 988 Lines: 23 On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:17:02AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On the other hand I would like to keep the option to be more aggressive > for soft page offlining where it's useful and nobody cares about > the cost. I'm not sure I understand what the goals are for "soft page offlining". Can you say a bit more about that? > Or the "let's add a updatedb" hint approach has the problem that > it won't cover a lot of other programs (as Linus always points out > these new interfaces rarely actually get used) Sure, but the number of programs that scan all of the files in a file system and would need this sort of hint are actually pretty small. Uptdatedb and backup programs are pretty much about it. - Ted -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/