Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754142Ab0BBBzq (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:55:46 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:44960 "EHLO mail-ew0-f228.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414Ab0BBBzl (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2010 20:55:41 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:mime-version:message-id:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VxM+xISKAEtQZgcWfOOCu4cjm2RkcfHcGd5vSK9jQiQmMnrX3fTiAqhlNkVPcwItZ3 /qQFmSX72GX+jWK2hlrzkRZP2/4FXhokCbZmAs8Zw4kpu1Ir8js/dMVuAl7oPFSy/Ca7 m+tvWQpcjB1ytwx58z9Cp1DYSDhxkvXOYpBhw= From: Edward Shishkin To: Andrew Morton , ReiserFS Development List Subject: [patch 0/7] per-bdi flushing model improvements. reiser4 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 02:55:46 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.3 (Linux/2.6.27.41-170.2.117.fc10.i686; KDE/4.3.3; i686; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201002020255.46920.edward.shishkin@gmail.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, jens.axboe@oracle.com Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2138 Lines: 47 Hello. Andrew Morton wrote: > reiser4 is currently disabled in -mm (via reiser4-disable.patch) > because recent changes to fs/fs/writeback.c wrecked the build. I fixed > it about ten times as the underlying code was churning, then gave up. It > would be nice if you take a look at that sometime please. > > I have taken a look at fs/fs-writeback.c and found that per-superblock flushing interface is eliminated. However migrating to per-bdi flushing model doesn't necessarily means that such interface doesn't exist or is not needed anymore. Flushing in accordance with the scheme "data-inode- data-inode-..." would be very suboptimal for reiser4. Also xfs people were unhappy with such flushing model: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.file-systems/30153 Moreover, current stuff doesn't look fine. Why do we pin/unpin superblock for every inode? It would be more reasonable to pin it for the whole group of inodes and call a flushing handler for them. The patch 4 introduces such handler writeback_sb_inodes (which resembles dropped sync_sb_inodes, the difference is that the newer version doesn't flush necessarily all inodes of the superblock). Please, consider pushing this patch to mainline. The patch 5 adds a super operation .writeback_inodes (former .sync_inodes) which allows a file system to make optimizations. It can happen that reiser4 will flush a bit more inodes then generic implementation suggests. "a bit more" doesn't mean "all dirty inodes of the superblock" (see a comment about atoms in the header of patch 6). Finally, some file systems have its own means for periodical writeout of dirty data. Since b_io contains inodes of many superblocks we need to evict our inodes back to dirty list when flushing is going on with for_kupdate flag installed. The new library function writeback_skip_sb_inodes() provides such possibility. Please, apply. Thanks, Edward. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/