Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755826Ab0BBHli (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 02:41:38 -0500 Received: from mail-gx0-f224.google.com ([209.85.217.224]:39289 "EHLO mail-gx0-f224.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755758Ab0BBHlc (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 02:41:32 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=kjQuoI/4Q76r3pRj65JC//4D0SBiLU+sDHJWaZjcYxPtBtlbu5WNbToBqPtx1JmEVu SS2E+M96rkevGnuYpJFCNKRBfIiS5Q9iRB/ITHUIUq4lAp80OLSjxfSl4GP2NcKB82KI 2vf1kKyvfYN9jS9cAyRouu6V65ryFfwk7fYiY= Message-ID: <4B67D76A.3050906@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 01 Feb 2010 23:42:34 -0800 From: "Justin P. Mattock" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.4pre) Gecko/20091114 Lightning/1.0pre Thunderbird/3.0b4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Stefan Richter CC: Dan Carpenter , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Testers List Subject: Re: ohci1394_dma=early crash since 2.6.32 (was Re: [Bug #14487] PANIC: early exception 08 rip 246:10 error ffffffff810251b5 cr2 0) References: <4B6630CA.9010207@gmail.com> <20100201125441.GB2576@bicker> <4B671606.3080405@gmail.com> <4B673233.8000300@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4B6740B5.5070601@gmail.com> <4B675534.5070107@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4B676917.2080506@gmail.com> <4B67BC12.4080709@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4B67C4D2.5050205@gmail.com> <4B67CC55.40301@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <4B67CCEC.2030103@s5r6.in-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <4B67CCEC.2030103@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 832 Lines: 21 On 02/01/10 22:57, Stefan Richter wrote: > Stefan Richter wrote: >> Do I understand correctly that at this moment it is only known that the >> bug could be >> - *either* a 2.6.31 -> 2.6.32 regression >> - *or* an x86-64 specific bug that does not occur on x86-32, >> right? > > (OK, according to your other post it /is/ a regression, at least on > x86-64 and definitely between 2.6.27 (good) and 2.6.32 (bad).) I'll go with the bisect in the morning(late over here), and then go from there.(just pissed at myself for not thinking to do this at the beginning). Justin P. Mattock -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/