Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 04:28:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 04:28:30 -0400 Received: from outpost.ds9a.nl ([213.244.168.210]:25056 "HELO outpost.powerdns.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 04:28:30 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 10:28:28 +0200 From: bert hubert To: Olaf Fraczyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Message-ID: <20020417102828.D11817@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mail-Followup-To: bert hubert , Olaf Fraczyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020416074748.GA16657@venus.local.navi.pl> <20020416233457.A1731@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20020416222156.GB20464@turbolinux.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 16, 2002 at 10:24:26PM +0000, Andreas Dilger wrote: > Trivially fixed with the existing 64-bit jiffies patches. As it is, > your uptime wraps to zero after 472 days or something like that if you > don't have the 64-bit jiffies patch, which is totally in the realm of > possibility for Linux servers. I feel your pain 4:26am up 482 days, 10:33, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00 On a very remote server. So can we please merge the 64-bit jiffies patches? I sometimes think that that is the main reason why alpha DOES have HZ=1024 - the jiffies there don't wrap in an embarrassing way within two months :-) Regards, bert -- http://www.PowerDNS.com Versatile DNS Software & Services http://www.tk the dot in .tk http://lartc.org Linux Advanced Routing & Traffic Control HOWTO - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/