Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753115Ab0BBLz4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:55:56 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:60964 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753878Ab0BBLzx (ORCPT ); Tue, 2 Feb 2010 06:55:53 -0500 Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 22:55:45 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Mark Brown Cc: Takashi Iwai , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: linux-next: sound tree build failure Message-Id: <20100202225545.84a4fa84.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20100202113424.GH6566@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> References: <20100202124711.d8cdc220.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100202102609.GA6566@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20100202213732.586a3566.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100202105800.GE6566@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> <20100202221743.1dbcad11.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20100202113424.GH6566@rakim.wolfsonmicro.main> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.0beta7 (GTK+ 2.18.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__2_Feb_2010_22_55_45_+1100_1J/Ij.PY5g=A0AJO" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1557 Lines: 42 --Signature=_Tue__2_Feb_2010_22_55_45_+1100_1J/Ij.PY5g=A0AJO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Mark, On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:34:24 +0000 Mark Brown wrote: > > The way I've always read that was that you'd found a build failure in > a given bit of the tree while testing -next - you're clearly doing some > work to identify and understand where the failure came from (and simply > looking at the source file leads to the same result normally anyway) so > the fact that you've identified the subsystem doesn't automatically say > that this happened with a partially merged -next. If you looked less > like a human the subject by itself would be clearer :) How about "linux-next: build failure after merging xxx tree"? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Tue__2_Feb_2010_22_55_45_+1100_1J/Ij.PY5g=A0AJO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAktoEsEACgkQjjKRsyhoI8wUOwCdHjK5FPDGtfcKA/cTmpkuknFa yB0AnA35C+04nUvztlB49TUlVEHJswJn =kmhi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__2_Feb_2010_22_55_45_+1100_1J/Ij.PY5g=A0AJO-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/