Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:06:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:06:24 -0400 Received: from dial249.pm3abing3.abingdonpm.naxs.com ([216.98.75.249]:26515 "EHLO ani.animx.eu.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:06:22 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:09:37 -0400 From: Wakko Warner To: bert hubert , Olaf Fraczyk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: please merge 64-bit jiffy patches. Was Re: Why HZ on i386 is 100 ? Message-ID: <20020417070937.A29310@animx.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <20020416074748.GA16657@venus.local.navi.pl> <20020416233457.A1731@outpost.ds9a.nl> <20020416222156.GB20464@turbolinux.com> <20020417102828.D11817@outpost.ds9a.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > Trivially fixed with the existing 64-bit jiffies patches. As it is, > > your uptime wraps to zero after 472 days or something like that if you > > don't have the 64-bit jiffies patch, which is totally in the realm of > > possibility for Linux servers. > > I feel your pain > > 4:26am up 482 days, 10:33, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.02, 0.00 > > On a very remote server. > > So can we please merge the 64-bit jiffies patches? I sometimes think that > that is the main reason why alpha DOES have HZ=1024 - the jiffies there > don't wrap in an embarrassing way within two months :-) Yes, but being that the alpha is 64-bit, it doesn't wrap at 49.7 days. I've seen mine at 60 days or so. -- Lab tests show that use of micro$oft causes cancer in lab animals - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/