Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756857Ab0BDEGj (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:06:39 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f189.google.com ([209.85.211.189]:64058 "EHLO mail-yw0-f189.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756407Ab0BDEGi convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:06:38 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=O/WjSb1zKn3QzaL0yVwpiW5rsFO8VcOAISP/U+EPlNf8umdZA4CnBSolhkAoAYMYet kgeFVUbeHTlcHCR8dYgctJw8jrjTxDq/AGbuljaNziwDcmEYW80j/S4+GMYogemGU9pU 46UUWn4bW87hjahA9OoHfTDkLnc2xx4d3PD1I= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1265253206-17744-3-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> References: <1265253206-17744-1-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1265253206-17744-3-git-send-email-fujita.tomonori@lab.ntt.co.jp> Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 23:06:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 3/4] alpha: remove dma_sync_single_range From: Matt Turner To: FUJITA Tomonori Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, Richard Henderson , Ivan Kokshaysky Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1950 Lines: 45 On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 10:13 PM, FUJITA Tomonori wrote: > dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device supports a partial sync so there is > no point to have dma_sync_single_range (also dma_sync_single was > obsoleted long ago, replaced with dma_sync_single_for_cpu/for_device). > > There is no user of dma_sync_single_range() in mainline and only Alpha > architecture supports dma_sync_single_range(). So it's unlikely that > someone out of the tree uses it. > > Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori > Cc: Richard Henderson > Cc: Ivan Kokshaysky > Cc: Matt Turner > --- > ?arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | ? ?1 - > ?1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > index 04eb568..f514ede 100644 > --- a/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > +++ b/arch/alpha/include/asm/dma-mapping.h > @@ -59,7 +59,6 @@ int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 mask); > > ?#define dma_sync_single_for_cpu(dev, addr, size, dir) ? ?((void)0) > ?#define dma_sync_single_for_device(dev, addr, size, dir) ?((void)0) > -#define dma_sync_single_range(dev, addr, off, size, dir) ?((void)0) > ?#define dma_sync_sg_for_cpu(dev, sg, nents, dir) ? ? ? ? ((void)0) > ?#define dma_sync_sg_for_device(dev, sg, nents, dir) ? ? ?((void)0) > ?#define dma_cache_sync(dev, va, size, dir) ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ((void)0) > -- > 1.5.6.5 Acked-by: Matt Turner Should I vacuum this one up, or should it go in the -mm tree? I don't guess there's much point in sending Linus pull requests for single patches. Matt -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/