Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758113Ab0BDMgA (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:36:00 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f189.google.com ([209.85.223.189]:63002 "EHLO mail-iw0-f189.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757910Ab0BDMf7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:35:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ZbOXRqAdmXcnH6q9LRNVTf15padqycV4zMaynKFQpOMZ0bvK42Grijb4Bdij2dDJQx V7en/gmi0YuJpTYIYAc75aZUNplLdfHXt6RT5yymJ6YtmmisiTb/suisUrPCesN19gex H9wbqXBcaFGK/XO0UMRfJ8Cp4vXE69pAoUOGE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4B6ABDEF.8090005@trash.net> References: <1265108690.2861.118.camel@tonnant> <1265134598.2861.191.camel@tonnant> <4B6870AF.6060109@trash.net> <4B6967BC.600@trash.net> <1265222289.2861.290.camel@tonnant> <20100203190948.GA5182@x200> <1265226227.2861.302.camel@tonnant> <4B6ABCB8.4080904@trash.net> <4B6ABDEF.8090005@trash.net> Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:35:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] netfilter: per netns nf_conntrack_cachep From: Alexey Dobriyan To: Patrick McHardy Cc: Jon Masters , Eric Dumazet , linux-kernel , netdev , netfilter-devel , "Paul E. McKenney" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1123 Lines: 25 On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:30 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: > Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Patrick McHardy wrote: >>> Jon Masters wrote: >>>> On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 21:09 +0200, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: >>>>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 01:38:09PM -0500, Jon Masters wrote: >>>>>> *). Per namespace cacheing allocation (the cachep bits). We know it's >>>>>> still possible for weirdness to happen in the SLAB cache here. >>>>> Tiny race, needs reproducer. >>>> Maybe. I think it's worth fixing anyway. >>> Absolutely, I'll also apply Eric's patch with the %p fix for the >>> slab name. >> >> This would show kernel pointers in userspace ;-) >> So, net->id is required. > > I don't see the problem. But yes, it would be nicer to have an ID. This is done (or rather, not done) to not show attackers where data structures are. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/