Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755435Ab0BDRzS (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:55:18 -0500 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:48974 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751890Ab0BDRzQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:55:16 -0500 Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 18:54:45 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Matthew Garrett Cc: Dave Airlie , Dave Airlie , torvalds@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.sf.net Subject: Re: hung bootup with "drm/radeon/kms: move radeon KMS on/off switch out of staging." Message-ID: <20100204175445.GB27361@elte.hu> References: <20100202081727.GA6788@elte.hu> <21d7e9971002020035v22318962w6412ccd8d93449da@mail.gmail.com> <20100202154656.GD27314@elte.hu> <21d7e9971002021234y275fae02k410af92bb16fee73@mail.gmail.com> <20100204062619.GA29154@elte.hu> <20100204071705.GA28403@elte.hu> <20100204164859.GA17878@srcf.ucam.org> <20100204170826.GA16397@elte.hu> <20100204173602.GA19855@srcf.ucam.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100204173602.GA19855@srcf.ucam.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1816 Lines: 42 * Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 06:08:26PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Well, once i applied the revert i got no more hangs or crashes today, in > > lots of bootups. This is fully repeatable - if i re-apply that commit > > with the config i sent the hang happens again. > > If you leave the commit applied, use that config and then enable Radeon KMS > under staging, do you get the hang? drivers/staging/ is generally an exception from all sorts of regression (and ABI compatibility, etc.) policies so i dont auto-test it. (because simpy i cannot do it in a sane way) I do test the other thousands of regular mainline drivers though - more than a hundred of which get activated for real on my various test-systems. So if you move a driver (or a piece of a driver) from drivers/staging to drivers/ in the -rc6 timeframe, and it causes trouble, i see it as a new regression. But you could claim that it's not a regression because 1) technically the code got introduced in drivers/staging/, and staging drivers are not on the regression list 2) the Kconfig value is default-off so it can only harm those who got lured by a new Kconfig value popping up in -rc7 in a well working driver they already have enabled. So the moving of driver functionality from drivers/staging/ to drivers/ is a grey area it appears. Wouldnt it have been better to do this in the next merge window, as all other drivers do? It's not new hardware enablement either, it's feature enablement for an existing driver. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/