Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:50:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:50:15 -0400 Received: from ns.snowman.net ([63.80.4.34]:28946 "EHLO ns.snowman.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:50:14 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:48:24 -0400 (EDT) From: To: Kent Borg cc: "Jeff V. Merkey" , Alan Cox , Baldur Norddahl , Mike Dresser , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: IDE/raid performance In-Reply-To: <20020417134716.D10041@borg.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org It's fairly common in SCSI raid setups, however I've never seen it for IDE. Nick On Wed, 17 Apr 2002, Kent Borg wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 10:27:22AM -0700, Jeff V. Merkey wrote: > > From my analysis with 3Ware at 32 drive configurations, you really > > need to power the drives from a separate power supply is you have > > more than 16 devices. They really suck the power during initial > > spinup. > > It seems an obvious help would be to have the option of spinning up > the drives one at a time at 2-3 second intervals. I know a fast drive > doesn't get up to speed in 3 seconds, but the nastiest draw is going > to be over by then. > > A machine with 32 drives is pretty serious stuff and probably isn't > booting in a few seconds anyway--another 60-some seconds might be a > desirable option. > > Does this exist anywhere? Would it have to be a BIOS feature? > > > -kb > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/