DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        b=SB6PbV6bL+PKT/zg3aG/x/kbzpopCGzaAsSpTkxXLmqCjKx3BdD50K9hoVBiQMcB9x
         CXpsAi/mr/GTPbycJZ1fv8py2Pa3Glw/csfDQFGGwxdAOotSCc15ixtz/yxSYX1aG8/H
         0piAW+ily1kdhiWNsAZIcZGShnRKcDqPOvhyE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201002031039.710275915@firstfloor.org>
References: <201002031039.710275915@firstfloor.org>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:27:57 +0200
Message-ID: <84144f021002050027r3617d333scb875163e2e04c27@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [0/4] SLAB: Fix a couple of slab memory hotadd issues
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: submit@firstfloor.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, haicheng.li@intel.com,
       linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>,
       Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 693
Lines: 17

Hi Andi,

On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 11:39 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> This fixes various problems in slab found during memory hotadd testing.
>
> All straight forward bug fixes, so could be still .33 candidates.

AFAICT, they aren't regression fixes so they should wait for .34, no?
The patches look good to me. Nick, Christoph, you might want to take a
peek at them before I shove them in linux-next.

                        Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/