Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755005Ab0BEIbw (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:31:52 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f220.google.com ([209.85.220.220]:40893 "EHLO mail-fx0-f220.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752314Ab0BEIbv (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Feb 2010 03:31:51 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:cc:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date :message-id:mime-version:x-mailer:content-transfer-encoding; b=hmFKiv+JDULw6IChaoo/h8oRI/SwRFJifUIHa2KncHkdETggYIJaeCr8GrUIsDxiD4 iFJX1FFaPFkS3fXpcxxTLjy2EImnlUq6OJN39LygTurwEHJR+PEiOcytJxCto7nq1bhh JM9VJ/A7t6m6vruLN+kc3qXGg16Ic9Pqz17Fk= Subject: Re: [PATCH] MMC: fix hang if card was removed during suspend and unsafe resume was enabled From: Maxim Levitsky To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Philip Langdale , linux-kernel , Jorg Schummer , linux-pm In-Reply-To: <20100204160957.1c51cc1b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <1265219241.12549.8.camel@maxim-laptop> <1265325495-4220-1-git-send-email-maximlevitsky@gmail.com> <20100204160957.1c51cc1b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2010 10:31:42 +0200 Message-ID: <1265358702.3424.8.camel@maxim-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1850 Lines: 47 On Thu, 2010-02-04 at 16:09 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 01:18:15 +0200 Maxim Levitsky wrote: > > > Currently removal of the card leads to del_disk called indirectly by mmc core. > > This function expects userspace to be running, which isn't when .resume is called > > > > Fix that by removing the code that did that in mmc_resume_host. It is possible > > because card detection logic will kick it later and remove the card. > > I don't really understand. The above implies that to trigger this bug, > one needs to physically remove the card during a resume operation. ie: > a human-vs-computer race. Sounds unlikely? > > So... exactly what steps does the user need to take to trigger this Sorry for describing this poorly. The steps are: -> Have a kernel with CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME -> Insert MMC/SD card -> Suspend/hibernate the system -> While system is hibernated/suspended pull the card off -> Resume the system -> Hang if CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME is set, mmc core allows the user to suspend/resume the card normally assuming he won't change the card or modify it in another system. The former case is actually handled quite well. if CONFIG_MMC_UNSAFE_RESUME isn't set, it removes the card during suspend, and I now think (and will test) that this will still hang the system this time on suspend. Maybe we can make del_disk behave well if called with userspace frozen? After all if user calls it, very likely that hardware is absent thus there is no point in syncing (which I think triggers the hang).... Best regards, Maxim Levitsky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/