Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753432Ab0BGNkA (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 08:40:00 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f228.google.com ([209.85.219.228]:48108 "EHLO mail-ew0-f228.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751007Ab0BGNj7 (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Feb 2010 08:39:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=KvWzPIAdxX1wW9JL8R/4mAsjOKyevmnhj4wk29vY4dQy+jJEW3i2M6cZ8MneuS57Rq ZzB8rn0YDgOMelM1hKJwWD3/LW7ArMOcCCsxSG5VD4Erjo6CpsKNhK4pkQviKws5ifn8 w9AcvhDzhLqjsoaVnRzyRzEo0n26IHLLW1kiM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2010 08:39:57 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Multi-card DRI interface timeframe From: Robert Bradbury To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1849 Lines: 39 Have: Radeon R3450 & Intel i915. Want multiple X terminals and multiple screens. Excerpted logs: Xorg.2.log:(II) RADEONHD(0): [DRI] installation complete Xorg.3.log:(EE) RADEONHD(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. Xterms :0 and :1 are like :3. I am under the impression that only one VT (here :2) can get the DRI interface. That terminals is fast, the rest much less so. (Its also annoying that the DRI gets assigned to the VT/X started but assume thats an Xorg scheduling issue). I am under the impression that how many VTs/X Servers can use the DRI is a kernel issue. Q1: What is the kernel development time frame for allowing the active VT to take control of the DRI interface? Now, this machine has both the Intel i915 graphics interface and F3450 card with 2 video interfaces. The X server (via Xorg.conf) has no problem setting up both hardware controllers. It is possible to do dual screen (like xinerama but using a large virtual screen) across both Radeon interfaces. However one cannot do "dual screen" (or tri-screen) across both hardware controllers. (Of course in this situation it seems that switching VTs would involve switching both controllers so it would seem to me to involve kernel issues.) Q2: What is the kernel development time frame for allowing mixing and matching video controller hardware across multiple screens? I realize that this is not the focus of the LKML per se but the KMS, DRI, and controller drivers all *are* in the Kernel. If other forums would be better for these types of questions then please suggest them. Thank you, Robert Bradbury -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/