Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:09:40 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:09:30 -0500 Received: from mailhub2.shef.ac.uk ([143.167.2.154]:52717 "EHLO mailhub2.shef.ac.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:09:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 14:38:38 +0000 (GMT) From: Guennadi Liakhovetski To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: BIOS / kernel vrt IDE DMA Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello all I posted on this subject before, but this time I just would like to receive an answer to the question - BIOS or kernel - who rules? So, the question: is it either 1) there ARE situations when BIOS's inability to support DMA for IDE cannot be fixed by the software or 2) it IS always possible, so, something is wrong with the software (kernel / its configuration) For those of you unfamiliar with the situation - some details: I've been fighting with this problem for a few weeks now. The problem seems to be that my BIOS does not support DMA for IDE and the kernel cannot bypass it. The chipset is ok (Intel 430FX), the disk too, afaik I included all possible parameters in the kernel (2.2.17 + ide patch). But the BIOS is old (AMI 1.00.04.CA0 for Intel Morrison64 aka Advanced/MN mobo with a P-75 and onboard S3-Trio64) and no upgrades exist. Also, I read somewhere, that one often can flash a 'non-native' BIOS... Does anybody know of identical mobos (430FX + S3-Trio64)? Note, that Morrison32's BIOS (S3-Trio32) does not suit. Thanks Guennadi ___ Dr. Guennadi V. Liakhovetski Department of Applied Mathematics University of Sheffield, U.K. email: G.Liakhovetski@sheffield.ac.uk - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/