Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:20:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:20:15 -0400 Received: from tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU ([129.94.242.28]:44206 "HELO tone.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 22:20:14 -0400 From: Neil Brown To: Mike Fedyk Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 12:23:38 +1000 (EST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15550.11818.429509.22486@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au> Cc: Richard Gooch , Andreas Dilger , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: RAID superblock confusion In-Reply-To: message from Mike Fedyk on Wednesday April 17 X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 20.7.2 X-face: [Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D On Thu, Apr 18, 2002 at 11:54:13AM +1000, Neil Brown wrote: > > On Saturday April 13, rgooch@ras.ucalgary.ca wrote: > > > If there was only a "do as I say, regardless" mode, I would be happy. > > > This programmer-knows-best attitude smacks of M$. > > > > mdadm will do as you say, reguardless - if you ask it to. Have you > > tried mdadm? > > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~neilb/source/mdadm/ > > Niel, do you plan to merge mdadm into the raidtools package? It sounds like > it belongs there. No. If distributions want to distribute mdadm together with the stuff from raidtools, then that is up to them. But from a development perspective, I don't see any value in making a single source distribution. NeilBrown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/