Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:30:41 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:30:40 -0400 Received: from vger.timpanogas.org ([216.250.140.154]:40335 "EHLO vger.timpanogas.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 00:30:40 -0400 Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:50:54 -0700 From: "Jeff V. Merkey" To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: James Bourne , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hyperthreading Message-ID: <20020417215054.A29118@vger.timpanogas.org> In-Reply-To: <1833210000.1019077852@flay> <20020417142617.B27778@vger.timpanogas.org> <1871700000.1019089865@flay> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 17, 2002 at 05:31:05PM -0700, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > >> Before you get too excited about that, how much performance boost do > >> you actually get by turning on Hyperthreading? ;-) > > > > In my testing with SCI, it speeds up some operations and with 3Ware > > it increases throuput about 10 MB/S. Not a lot but there is some > > improvement (if you can get around the lockups during boot). > > What's that 10MB/s as a percentage of the overall performance? > > M. 247-251 (with) vs. 227-238 (without) MB/S Jeff - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/