From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: =?utf-8?q?Rafa=C5=82_Mi=C5=82ecki?= <zajec5@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Bug #15096] Resume lock up -- bisected, commit 3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2010 20:24:32 +0100
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.33-rc7-rjw; KDE/4.3.5; x86_64; ; )
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
       Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
       Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>,
       Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>,
       Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
References: <2uzMDuY-7_O.A.M1G.7X1bLB@chimera> <201002081156.24020.rjw@sisk.pl> <b170af451002080349x4fb955b2wb9d0bdf6e6e03d0e@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <b170af451002080349x4fb955b2wb9d0bdf6e6e03d0e@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
  charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT
Message-Id: <201002082024.32483.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1677
Lines: 34

On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> W dniu 8 lutego 2010 11:56 użytkownik Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> napisał:
> > On Monday 08 February 2010, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
> >> 2010/2/8 Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>:
> >> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> >> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.
> >> >
> >> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> >> > introduced between 2.6.31 and 2.6.32.  Please verify if it still should
> >> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > Bug-Entry       : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15096
> >> > Subject         : Resume lock up -- bisected, commit 3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369
> >> > Submitter       : Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
> >> > Date            : 2010-01-20 23:15 (19 days old)
> >> > First-Bad-Commit: http://git.kernel.org/git/linus/3a1151e3f124fd1a2c54b8153f510f1a7c715369
> >
> > It looks like we should revert this commit, seems broken.
> >
> > Anyway, I'll do my best to have a look at this bug later today.
> 
> In such case I'd prefer to add "broken_DOS" flag for devices that were
> enabled by this patch. We could avoid restoring backlight on resume
> for broken_DOS then and maybe just update brightness to current value.

Or perhaps we can try to restore the backlight at a different place.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/