Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754866Ab0BIP4T (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:56:19 -0500 Received: from smtp02.citrix.com ([66.165.176.63]:29065 "EHLO SMTP02.CITRIX.COM" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754627Ab0BIP4R (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:56:17 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.49,436,1262581200"; d="scan'208";a="83432800" From: Ian Campbell To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Ian Campbell , x86@kernel.org Subject: [PATCH 0/3] x86: slightly unify ret_from_fork Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2010 15:56:06 +0000 Message-Id: <1265730969-30145-1-git-send-email-ian.campbell@citrix.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.5.6.5 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Feb 2010 15:56:14.0720 (UTC) FILETIME=[6889C000:01CAA9A0] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 572 Lines: 12 I came across some minor differences between the 32 and 64 bit implementations of ret_from_fork. Although I don't expect this is code which can realistically be completely unified there seemed to be some value in making the two look a bit more similar. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Cc: x86@kernel.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/