Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:44:27 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:44:17 -0500 Received: from cerebus-ext.cygnus.co.uk ([194.130.39.252]:39409 "EHLO tantra.cygnus.co.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 10:44:13 -0500 From: David Howells To: Christoph Rohland Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH,preliminary] cleanup shm handling In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 Dec 2000 14:23:06 +0100." Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:13:45 +0000 Message-ID: <20295.976288425@warthog.cygnus> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > here is my first shot for cleaning up the shm handling. It did survive > some basic testing but is not ready for inclusion. Can you help me with an SHM related problem? I'm currently writing a Win32 emulation kernel module to help speed Wine up, and I'm writing the file mapping support stuff at the moment (CreateFileMapping and MapViewOfFile). I have PE Image mapping just about working (fixups, misaligned file sections and all), but I'm trying to think of a good way of doing anonymous shared mappings without having to hack the main kernel around too much (so far I've only had to add to kernel/ksyms.c). Is there a reasonable way I could hook into the SHM system to "reserve" a chunk of shared memory of a particular size, and then a second hook by which I can "map" _part_ of that into a process's address space? Cheers, David PS: to anyone else reading this, if you wrote do_generic_file_read(), it rocks! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/