Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:28:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:28:14 -0400 Received: from gate.in-addr.de ([212.8.193.158]:32263 "HELO mx.in-addr.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 18 Apr 2002 11:28:14 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:27:58 +0200 From: Lars Marowsky-Bree To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Versioning File Systems? Message-ID: <20020418172758.Q4498@marowsky-bree.de> In-Reply-To: <20020418110558.A16135@borg.org> <20020418082025.N2710@work.bitmover.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.22.1i X-Ctuhulu: HASTUR Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2002-04-18T08:20:25, Larry McVoy said: > It's certainly a fun space, file system hacking is always fun. There > doesn't seem to be a good match between file system operations and > SCM operations, especially stuff like checkin. write != checkin. > But you can handle that with Either that, or heuristics - file not written to / opened for writing in x minutes -> commit. That would actually be pretty interesting because it might also allow you to back out editor screwups ;-) However, deducing change sets is more difficult. Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Br?e -- Immortality is an adequate definition of high availability for me. --- Gregory F. Pfister - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/