Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:02:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:02:31 -0500 Received: from Cantor.suse.de ([194.112.123.193]:56837 "HELO Cantor.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 11:02:22 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 16:31:54 +0100 From: Andi Kleen To: "David S. Miller" Cc: fribes@capgemini.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Networking: RFC1122 and 1123 status for kernel 2.4 Message-ID: <20001208163154.A20038@gruyere.muc.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <3A30F463.2EE04F4E@capgemini.fr> <200012081454.GAA02632@pizda.ninka.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200012081454.GAA02632@pizda.ninka.net>; from davem@redhat.com on Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 06:54:28AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: > Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 15:46:59 +0100 > From: Fabien Ribes > > Looking at Linux kernel sources, I've found RFC1122 status splitted in > each file. Is there a complete document showing RFC1122 status as a > whole for a given kernel version ? > > No, unfortunately nobody has the time to do this. The RFC evaluation is also out of date and should be either redone or removed. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/