Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757428Ab0BKXA2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:00:28 -0500 Received: from lucidpixels.com ([75.144.35.66]:44508 "EHLO lucidpixels.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757414Ab0BKXA0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:00:26 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:00:23 -0500 (EST) From: Justin Piszcz To: linux-raid@vger.kernel.org cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Linux mdadm superblock question. Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 521 Lines: 15 Hi, I may be converting a host to ext4 and was curious, is 0.90 still the only superblock version for mdadm/raid-1 that you can boot from without having to create an initrd/etc? Are there any benefits to using a superblock > 0.90 for a raid-1 boot volume < 2TB? Justin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/