Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757063Ab0BLP0d (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:26:33 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:54953 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756927Ab0BLP0b (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 10:26:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 07:21:37 -0800 (PST) From: Linus Torvalds X-X-Sender: torvalds@localhost.localdomain To: Jean Delvare cc: "J.H." , "FTPAdmin Kernel.org" , users@kernel.org, lasse.collin@tukaani.org, linux-kernel , mirrors@kernel.org Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] XZ Migration discussion In-Reply-To: <20100212150137.648dca7c@hyperion.delvare> Message-ID: References: <4B744E13.8040004@kernel.org> <20100212150137.648dca7c@hyperion.delvare> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1747 Lines: 44 On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Maybe that's just me, but my main concern is neither download times nor > decompression times. My main concern is the access time to directory > indexes when browsing the kernel archive, because there are 5 entries > for every patch or tarball: .bz2, .bz2.sign, .gz, .gz.sign and .sign. > This is horribly slow. This was actually the main reason for me personally to ask about just dropping support for .gz files - not because I care deeply about how much disk space kernel.org wastes, but because the long directory listings make it slower for me to mentally index the directory. > 1* Keep a single compression format. This saves almost 40% of the > files. > > 2* Move one of the compression formats somewhere else, so that it > doesn't get in the way but is still available if needed. > > 3* Create a new subdirectory for every 2.6.x kernel, and move all the > related files there. I did 3* for the testing kernels (exactly because the directory listing got to be unreadable), and you just complained about it ;) Of course, your complaint was that the subdirectory wasn't done immediately, and that the old files get moved to their own subdirectory later as a "archival" thing. I just didn't want to change the location for the latest kernel. > 4* Get rid of the LATEST-IS-* files. This is a small count, won't save > much, but these files seem totally useless to me these days. Yeah, they also end up continually being stale. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/