Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757528Ab0BLUmo (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:42:44 -0500 Received: from smtp1.hro.nl ([145.24.129.3]:36714 "EHLO smtp1.hro.nl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757217Ab0BLUmn convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:42:43 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 634 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Fri, 12 Feb 2010 15:42:43 EST Message-Id: <4B75C8CB.DBDA.0014.0@hro.nl> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.3 Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 21:31:58 +0100 From: "Sleddens, J.P.G." To: "FTPAdmin Kernel.org" , , , "linux-kernel" Subject: Re: [kernel.org mirrors] [kernel.org users] XZ Migration discussion References: <4B744E13.8040004@kernel.org> <20100212150137.648dca7c@hyperion.delvare> <4B75A5FE.8020408@zytor.com> In-Reply-To: <4B75A5FE.8020408@zytor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1524 Lines: 33 >>> On 12-2-2010 at 20:03, "H. Peter Anvin" wrote: > On 02/12/2010 06:01 AM, Jean Delvare wrote: >> 3* Create a new subdirectory for every 2.6.x kernel, and move all the >> related files there. This would shrink the main index drastically, and >> each subdirectory would have a reasonable size (except maybe 2.6.16 and >> 2.6.27.) Oddly enough this has been done for the files under testing/ >> already, so I am curious why we don't do it for the release files (and >> the testing/incr/ files, while we're at it.) > > Well, part of the reason why is that we're functionally "stuck" on 2.6; > a prefix which really has lost all meaning. > > It might open up the question if we shouldn't just do a Solaris and drop > the leading 2 (so the next kernel would be 6.33) or call the kernel > after that 3.0 instead of 2.6.34, and then 3.1 instead of 2.6.35. I remember the whole LKML discussion about this a few years back: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/10/15/377 The whole year.version or year/month versioning Greg HK proposed made a lot of sense to me. It would also solve our problem with the 2.6 directory just growing and growing as the year versioning would make a natural hierarchy which keeps going no matter what. -- Jeffry Sleddens Rotterdam University -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/