Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758063Ab0BMWgL (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:36:11 -0500 Received: from lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net ([195.173.77.150]:39764 "EHLO lon1-post-3.mail.demon.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750851Ab0BMWgK (ORCPT ); Sat, 13 Feb 2010 17:36:10 -0500 Message-ID: <4B7729B5.4040609@lougher.demon.co.uk> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:37:41 +0000 From: Phillip Lougher User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090817) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jean Delvare CC: "FTPAdmin Kernel.org" , users@kernel.org, lasse.collin@tukaani.org, mirrors@kernel.org, linux-kernel Subject: Re: [kernel.org users] XZ Migration discussion References: <4B744E13.8040004@kernel.org> <20100212150137.648dca7c@hyperion.delvare> <4B75A5CF.70308@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20100212203209.0cb8afc3@hyperion.delvare> <4B75B2A6.5080006@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20100212225923.36a67112@hyperion.delvare> <4B75E6C7.5030106@lougher.demon.co.uk> <20100213083115.5cf8d4a4@hyperion.delvare> In-Reply-To: <20100213083115.5cf8d4a4@hyperion.delvare> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1518 Lines: 31 Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 23:39:51 +0000, Phillip Lougher wrote: >> Jean Delvare wrote: >>> Prove it. Many people out there are still working on older trees. I am >>> working on 2.6.5 and 2.6.16 kernels on a weekly basis. If ketchup or >>> other tools break for these trees only and not more recent ones, that >>> won't help me at all, I will still have to update them. >> Why are you still working on 2.6.5 and 2.6.16 kernels on a weekly >> basis? > > Because I am doing support for enterprise customers who are using > distributions based on these kernel versions. These are SLE 9 and SLE > 10, to name them, but RHEL supporters are in the same situation. And > I've heard embedded developers report many times that they had to stick > to older 2.6.x kernels too for various reasons. Not everyone is using a > recent 2.6.x kernel, which makes it hard to draw a line between what > should be considered old ones and what should be considered new ones. > Embedded and enterprise distro users are usually stuck on ancient kernels that were downloaded from kernel.org and patched *years ago*. The reason they're stuck on them is due to local modifications, and so they're not going to be downloading ancient vanilla kernels from kernel.org now. Phillip -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/