Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:49:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:49:41 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:49056 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:49:40 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 23:48:51 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration thread fix Message-ID: <20020419064851.GC21206@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020419064052.GB21206@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org At some point in the past, I wrote: >>> looks perfectly good to me. Even with wli's patch i saw some migration >>> thread initialization weirdnesses. On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> It's a bit of a moot point, but I'd be interested in knowing what sort >> of weirdnesses those might be for my own edification. On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:41:04AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > a HT box wouldnt boot without an artificial mdelay(1000) in > migration_init() - while i havent fully debugged it (given Erich's patch), > it appeared to be some sort of race between idle thread startup and > migration init. I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many cpu's did you need to bring it out? Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/