Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:57:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:57:22 -0400 Received: from holomorphy.com ([66.224.33.161]:53152 "EHLO holomorphy") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 02:57:22 -0400 Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2002 23:56:32 -0700 From: William Lee Irwin III To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] migration thread fix Message-ID: <20020419065632.GD21206@holomorphy.com> Mail-Followup-To: William Lee Irwin III , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20020419064851.GC21206@holomorphy.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Description: brief message Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Organization: The Domain of Holomorphy Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 18 Apr 2002, William Lee Irwin III wrote: >> I've got a few of those around, I'll see if I can reproduce it. How many >> cpu's did you need to bring it out? On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 06:48:45AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > 2 physical - but i'd suggest to test Erich's patch instead. I had > debugging code in the scheduler which did printks, which slowed down some > of the operations in question, such as the startup of the idle thread - > which created weird situations. [which might not occur in normal testing, > but which are possible nevertheless.] That's not many. I'll try it on a bigger one, with a few big fat printk's in idle task startup and see if I can bring it down. It's an interesting little tidbit of programming. As I said earlier, Erich's patch already passed my testing. Thanks though. Cheers, Bill - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/