Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:43:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:43:47 -0400 Received: from nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com ([66.187.233.200]:34280 "EHLO devserv.devel.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:43:47 -0400 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 03:43:38 -0400 (EDT) From: Ingo Molnar X-X-Sender: mingo@devserv.devel.redhat.com To: Dieter =?iso-8859-15?q?N=FCtzel?= cc: "J.A. Magallon" , Linux Kernel List , Robert Love , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] Linux 2.4.19-pre7-jam1 In-Reply-To: <200204190136.15978.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] N?tzel wrote: > No uptodate O(1) patch for 2.4. Very sad. So there isn't any change to > see a current preemption patch on top of vm33 and O(1). > > [...] > I'm under the impression that "all" development is focused on 2.5.x, now. well, 2.5's scheduler bits were pretty much in flux in the past two months or so, partly due to the preemption feature going in. And there are a number of other changes in the pipeline as well. So what makes sense for 2.4 is Robert's plan: to backport O(1)+preempt once 2.5 is slowing down, that way we get the proper testing of both components, instead of a separated scheduler patch that doesnt even exist in that form in 2.5. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/