Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755281Ab0BOEfm (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:35:42 -0500 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:43246 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755128Ab0BOEfj (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:35:39 -0500 From: Nikanth Karthikesan Organization: suse.de To: Dave Chinner , Wu Fengguang Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Make VM_MAX_READAHEAD a kernel parameter Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:06:37 +0530 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.2 (Linux/2.6.31.8-0.1-desktop; KDE/4.3.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Ankit Jain , Andrew Morton , "balbir@linux.vnet.ibm.com" , Jens Axboe , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , Christian Ehrhardt References: <201002091659.27037.knikanth@suse.de> <201002111715.04411.knikanth@suse.de> <20100214213724.GA28392@discord.disaster> In-Reply-To: <20100214213724.GA28392@discord.disaster> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201002151006.37294.knikanth@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3304 Lines: 96 On Monday 15 February 2010 03:07:24 Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:15:03PM +0530, Nikanth Karthikesan wrote: > > On Thursday 11 February 2010 16:45:24 Ankit Jain wrote: > > > > +static int __init readahead(char *str) > > > > +{ > > > > + if (!str) > > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > > + vm_max_readahead_kb = memparse(str, &str) / 1024ULL; > > > > > > Just wondering, shouldn't you check whether the str had a valid value > > > [memparse (str, &next); next > str ..] and if it didn't, then use the > > > DEFAULT_VM_MAX_READAHEAD ? Otherwise, incase of a invalid > > > value, the readahead value will become zero. > > > > Thanks for the review. Here is the fixed patch that checks whether all of > > the parameters value is consumed. > > > > Thanks > > Nikanth > > > > From: Nikanth Karthikesan > > > > Add new kernel parameter "readahead", which would be used instead of the > > value of VM_MAX_READAHEAD. If the parameter is not specified, the default > > of 128kb would be used. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nikanth Karthikesan > > > > --- > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt index 736d456..354e6f1 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > +++ b/Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt > > @@ -2148,6 +2148,8 @@ and is between 256 and 4096 characters. It is > > defined in the file Format: [,[,...]] > > See arch/*/kernel/reboot.c or arch/*/kernel/process.c > > > > + readahead= Default readahead value for block devices. > > + > > I think the description should define the units (kb) and valid value > ranges e.g. page size to something not excessive - say 65536kb. The > above description is, IMO, useless without refering to the source to > find out this information.... > The parameter can be specified with/without any suffix(k/m/g) that memparse() helper function can accept. So it can take 1M, 1024k, 1050620. I checked other parameters that use memparse() to get similar values and they didn't document it. May be this should be described here. > [snip] > > > @@ -249,6 +250,24 @@ static int __init loglevel(char *str) > > > > early_param("loglevel", loglevel); > > > > +static int __init readahead(char *str) > > +{ > > + unsigned long readahead_kb; > > + > > + if (!str) > > + return -EINVAL; > > + readahead_kb = memparse(str, &str) / 1024ULL; > > + if (*str != '\0') > > + return -EINVAL; > > And readahead_kb needs to be validated against the range of > valid values here. > I didn't want to impose artificial restrictions. I think Wu's patch set would be adding some restrictions, like minimum readahead. He could fix it when he modifies the patch to include in his patch set. > > + > > + vm_max_readahead_kb = readahead_kb; > > + default_backing_dev_info.ra_pages = vm_max_readahead_kb > > + * 1024 / PAGE_CACHE_SIZE; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + > > +early_param("readahead", readahead); > > + > Thanks for reviewing. Thanks Nikanth -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/