Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:19:57 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:19:56 -0400 Received: from paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.181.130.15]:40674 "HELO paloma15.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 07:19:56 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Dieter =?iso-8859-1?q?N=FCtzel?= Organization: DN To: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCHSET] Linux 2.4.19-pre7-jam1 Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 13:19:46 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: "J.A. Magallon" , Linux Kernel List , Robert Love , Andrew Morton , Andrea Arcangeli , Alan Cox In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200204191319.46292.Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 19 April 2002 09:43, Ingo Molnar wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Dieter [iso-8859-15] N?tzel wrote: > > No uptodate O(1) patch for 2.4. Very sad. So there isn't any change to > > see a current preemption patch on top of vm33 and O(1). > > > > [...] > > I'm under the impression that "all" development is focused on 2.5.x, now. > > well, 2.5's scheduler bits were pretty much in flux in the past two months > or so, partly due to the preemption feature going in. And there are a > number of other changes in the pipeline as well. So what makes sense for > 2.4 is Robert's plan: to backport O(1)+preempt once 2.5 is slowing down, > that way we get the proper testing of both components, instead of a > separated scheduler patch that doesnt even exist in that form in 2.5. Thank you very much for your answer Ingo. It was somewhat still around you. So I was not sure if we have to be worry about you. OK, you are fine. Regards, Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/