Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:57:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:57:43 -0400 Received: from smtpde02.sap-ag.de ([194.39.131.53]:47318 "EHLO smtpde02.sap-ag.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 28 Oct 2000 11:57:33 -0400 To: James Lewis Nance Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: New VM problem In-Reply-To: <20001027070329.A884@bessie.dyndns.org> From: Christoph Rohland Date: 28 Oct 2000 17:59:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: James Lewis Nance's message of "Fri, 27 Oct 2000 07:03:29 -0400" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Capitol Reef) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Lines: 12 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org James Lewis Nance writes: > On an unrelated note, is it possible for a process in 2.4 to see more > than 2G of address space? They seem to be limited to 2G for me. I > was hoping that the HIMEM stuff had removed that limit. You have 3GB user space address space. 1 GB is still reserved for the kernel and you cannot break the 4GB limit for one process. But you can have multiple processes using their own <3GB chunk of memory. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/