DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=mMsomwVlo4uC424wnW+1XdlTCIMqaw9oM+pv1mRYpK3IWaWrdMWpPIivXnb3ZwmFQ0
         6U8NqMHF6IzqTrwV/fgem2dkuZp/YSdSMpeXnJ2o8osoG1wINKUi/I9Jel8z+5URpidx
         dTHxngSvq/BQ5NVhVmYlNU13HA46bTqetxYwA=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20100211044604.GA12146@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <1265765446-24958-1-git-send-email-richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
	 <2d460de71002091821h7b6e99b0gb8f134355f64c65a@mail.gmail.com>
	 <20100211044604.GA12146@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 12:56:15 +0100
Message-ID: <2d460de71002160356l6c26d513qba7d0cece32daddd@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] CRYPTO: Fix checkpatch errors & warnings in cipher.c
From: Richard Hartmann <richih.mailinglist@gmail.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
       linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 797
Lines: 24

On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 05:46, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:

>> Should I re-send the patch or is it less noise & hassle if I just leave
>> it this way?
>
> You don't have to resend it.

GregKH said that I should just re-send all patches after a week. OTOH, I
am not sure if this is not a little bit too agressive.

Thus, I wanted to check if I should wait some more or what the general
consensus of action in the crypto subtree is.

And yes, I am aware that janitor work, and thus my patches, is very low
priority.


Thanks,
Richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/