Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:22:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:22:14 -0400 Received: from smtp2.san.rr.com ([24.25.195.39]:50164 "EHLO smtp2.san.rr.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 19 Apr 2002 12:22:14 -0400 Subject: Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [BK PATCH] USB device support for2.5.8(take2) From: George J Karabin To: Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de Cc: Oliver Neukum , Greg KH , Linus Torvalds , David Brownell , linux-usb-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 (1.0.3-3) Date: 19 Apr 2002 09:22:08 -0700 Message-Id: <1019233329.1730.2.camel@pane.chasm.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2002-04-19 at 04:06, Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de wrote: > Why you do you want to derive a name from the specs ? > Someone who has read them will no what is refered to > whatever we name it. The significance of a the name > is important to those who look into usb code occasionaly. > These typically haven't read the spec. First thing that popped into my head, I guess. I'm not stuck on it - I guess that's all I have to say on it. Given the lack of other comments, I guess it's a dead idea anyway, or at least too far down in everyone's mail queues ;) - George - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/