Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 20:04:33 +0200
From: Frank de Lange <lkml-frank@unternet.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: severe slowdown with 2.4 series w/heavy disk access (revisited)
Message-ID: <20020419200433.C17439@unternet.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org

To clear up some potential confusion, the problems I'm talking about are NOT
related to the (erroneous) memory-related questions in the thread I pointed at.
It is the slowdowns which bother me, not the fact that the system 'uses up all
memory' (which is a good thing (tm)). Read a bit further into the thread and
you'll end up here:

http://hypermail.spyroid.com/linux-kernel/archived/2001/week52/0309.html

quote Alan Cox: "The free behaviour is correct (free memory is wasted memory).
The delays are obviously not"

That's why I'm asking these questions. The delays should not be there, but they
are, reproducible, over many different kernels and with several filesystems.

Cheers//Frank
 [ Moving to Sweden, looking for a project/job in V?stra G?taland... ] 
-- 
  WWWWW      ________________________
 ## o o\    /     Frank de Lange     \
 }#   \|   /                          \
  \ `--| _/     <Hacker for Hire>      \
   `---'  \      +31-320-252965        /
           \    frank@unternet.org    /
            `------------------------'
 [ "Omnis enim res, quae dando non deficit, dum habetur
    et non datur, nondum habetur, quomodo habenda est."  ]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/