Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:35:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:35:34 -0500 Received: from router-100M.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.17]:21521 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 12:35:20 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25 To: wtarreau@yahoo.fr (willy tarreau) Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 17:06:22 +0000 (GMT) Cc: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox), wtarreau@free.fr (Willy Tarreau), miquels@cistron.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20001208151632.17335.qmail@web1102.mail.yahoo.com> from "willy tarreau" at Dec 08, 2000 04:16:32 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > as soon as I can reboot it, I promise I will test the > kernel with and without the patch to be really sure. > but before that, if people who have problems with > megaraid/netraid could give it a try, that would be > cool. Also, it would be nice if people for which the > normal megaraid driver works would accept to check > this > doesn't break anything. Your patch changes the mask on both IO and memory ports to be MEM mask, which is obviously incorrect. It wont actually bite you because all the masking has already been done by pci_resource_start() so you are masking already zero bits. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/