Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:03:39 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:03:29 -0500 Received: from vena.lwn.net ([206.168.112.25]:265 "HELO eklektix.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:03:20 -0500 Message-ID: <20001208173246.25203.qmail@eklektix.com> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: On running user mode helpers From: Jonathan Corbet Date: Fri, 08 Dec 2000 10:32:46 -0700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I see we have a new "call_usermodehelper" routine now. It looks like the end result is similer to exec_usermodehelper, except that you no longer need to mess with creating kernel threads yourself. Is call_usermodehelper now the officially blessed way for kernel code to run something in user space? Perhaps exec_usermodehelper should become private to kmod.c? I also see that call_usermodehelper will call do_exit() if the exec fails, while the path taken in request_module does not do that. Can both be right? Thanks, jon Jonathan Corbet Executive editor, LWN.net corbet@lwn.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/