Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:37:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:37:45 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:45071 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 12:37:44 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:37:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Jeff Garzik cc: Daniel Phillips , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree In-Reply-To: <20020420115233.A617@havoc.gtf.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, 20 Apr 2002, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > Take your closed mind elsewhere. I'm pretty sure Linus has more sense > than to apply this patch. Absolutely. Like it or not, I personally use BK. I don't use CVS, and I don't use subversion. If anybody wants to maintain his own kernel, feel free to remove the documentation on how to interact with _me_. In such a kernel, those docs would obviously be meaningless. In fact, Daniel, if you had bothered to just even grep for CVS, you would have noticed that we've had CVS information for some other subprojects too, because _they_ happen to use CVS. Would you argue for removal of the CVS information in Documentation/filesystems/jfs.txt file? And if not, then you're a hypocritical bastard with a religious agenda. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/