Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S314661AbSDTRUU>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:20:20 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S314672AbSDTRUQ>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:20:16 -0400
Received: from smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl ([194.109.127.141]:52495 "EHLO
	smtpzilla5.xs4all.nl") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S314664AbSDTRT3>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:19:29 -0400
Message-ID: <3CC1A31B.AC03136D@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 19:19:23 +0200
From: Roman Zippel <zippel@linux-m68k.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.18 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
CC: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
In-Reply-To: <E16ya3u-0000RG-00@starship> <20020420115233.A617@havoc.gtf.org> <3CC19470.ACE2EFA1@linux-m68k.org> <20020420122541.B2093@havoc.gtf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi,

Jeff Garzik wrote:

> Daniel disagrees with the content of the speech in
> Documentation/BK-usage, based on his ideology.  And he attempted to
> restrict the dissemination of that speech.  What is the definition
> of censorship again?

Maybe I was to subtle, but your censorship argument is simply bullshit.
A link to the information is completely sufficient. The only question
is, whether the information is relevant for kernel development and most
of it is only bk documentation.

bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/