Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:07:50 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:07:44 -0500 Received: from service.sh.cvut.cz ([147.32.127.214]:21007 "EHLO service.sh.cvut.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Dec 2000 13:07:31 -0500 Date: Fri, 8 Dec 2000 18:36:42 +0100 (CET) From: Martin Kacer To: Alan Cox cc: , Andrea Arcangeli Subject: Re: Linux 2.2.18pre25 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 8 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: # > Is there any chance to get rid of these VMM failures? # By finding them. :-) I am not so familiar with MM in Linux. :^( And do not have enough time for intensive study... Although I would probably like that work... # Are you confident you are not running out of memory. Well, almost sure. This is the log with load records: (according to /proc/meminfo) FTPusers SMBusr load free mem free swap Fri Dec 8 14:35:05 CET 2000 61 35 6.17 3068 kB 128932 kB Fri Dec 8 14:40:04 CET 2000 59 36 5.05 2280 kB 130320 kB Fri Dec 8 14:45:03 CET 2000 59 36 5.97 2896 kB 131448 kB Fri Dec 8 14:50:03 CET 2000 59 35 6.59 2908 kB 133140 kB Fri Dec 8 14:55:04 CET 2000 53 36 8.82 2380 kB 133952 kB Fri Dec 8 15:00:03 CET 2000 53 40 6.42 2728 kB 135064 kB Fri Dec 8 15:05:03 CET 2000 48 39 5.47 2264 kB 135684 kB Fri Dec 8 15:10:03 CET 2000 48 41 3.90 3204 kB 135928 kB Fri Dec 8 15:15:03 CET 2000 51 41 5.93 2628 kB 135700 kB Fri Dec 8 15:20:03 CET 2000 50 45 6.50 2124 kB 135828 kB Fri Dec 8 15:25:03 CET 2000 56 44 7.92 2192 kB 136080 kB Fri Dec 8 15:30:03 CET 2000 49 45 10.89 2072 kB 136176 kB Fri Dec 8 15:35:03 CET 2000 51 42 6.32 2960 kB 136156 kB Fri Dec 8 15:40:04 CET 2000 54 44 6.92 2364 kB 136220 kB Fri Dec 8 15:45:03 CET 2000 54 44 6.63 2852 kB 136348 kB Fri Dec 8 15:50:04 CET 2000 53 46 3.63 2248 kB 136420 kB Fri Dec 8 15:55:03 CET 2000 59 48 6.51 3060 kB 136312 kB (crashed during the next 5 minutes) Doesn't seem to have consumed all of swap space. I will try to determine more info the next time - I promise... # Presumably since 2.2.13 works you are 8) I didn't tell it worked. It had worked a long time ago. It is still not tested now. Unfortunately, due to the absence of raid0 module the bootup process destroyed our 140GB partition. It will take some time to make the system running again. :-( Thank for your answer anyway... Martin. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/