Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:32:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:32:31 -0400 Received: from dsl-213-023-039-128.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.128]:22922 "EHLO starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:32:30 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:32:36 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] Cc: Anton Altaparmakov , In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Message-Id: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 20 April 2002 19:09, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > > > And some have a more difficult one. So it goes. > > How? Those who now chose to carry out their development using the patch+email method, and prefer to submit everything for discussion on lkml before it gets included are now largely out of the loop. Things just seem to *appear* in the tree now, without much fanfare. That's my impression. Rather than Linux development becoming more open, as I'd hoped with the advent of Bitkeeper, it seems to be turning more in the direction of becoming a closed club. This may be fun if you're a member of the club. Ah well, I'm a 'sorta' club member, why should I complain? All the same, I feel that something we all seemed to be headed towards with unity of purpose is somehow becoming more elusive. Being attacked personally for having this feeling does not help. -- Daniel - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/