Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756470Ab0BTVlX (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:41:23 -0500 Received: from ist.d-labs.de ([213.239.218.44]:55189 "EHLO mx01.d-labs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756078Ab0BTVlV (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 16:41:21 -0500 From: florian@mickler.org To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Randy Dunlap , Johannes Berg , "John W. Linville" , Alan Jenkins , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Florian Mickler Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Document and enhance rfkill sysfs abi Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 22:40:43 +0100 Message-Id: <1266702045-6062-1-git-send-email-florian@mickler.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.6.6.1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1003 Lines: 28 Hi! The first patch shuffles the sysfs-rfkill abi documentation into Documentation/ABI. The second patch is more a "why not?" question in patch-form. After stumbling over this arbitrary limitation of the rfkill*/state in the Documentation. Well.. why not? Cheers, Flo Florian Mickler (2): Document the rfkill sysfs ABI enhance /sys/class/rfkill//state interface Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-class-rfkill | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Documentation/rfkill.txt | 44 +++++------------- include/linux/rfkill.h | 3 + net/rfkill/core.c | 9 +++- 4 files changed, 89 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/stable/sysfs-class-rfkill -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/