Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:36:12 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:36:10 -0400 Received: from neon-gw-l3.transmeta.com ([63.209.4.196]:19217 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 13:36:05 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 10:35:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Linus Torvalds To: Daniel Phillips cc: Jeff Garzik , Roman Zippel , Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote: > > But did you think it might be controversial? Ehh, the documentaion? Nope, I didn't really think _that_ part would be controversial. The change to BK? I sure as hell knew that was going to be "interesting", yes absolutely. After all, it had been discussed at places like the kernel summit etc. But hey - I've never really cared about what other people think about what I do. If I had, I'd have given up on Linux when Tanenbaum ridiculed it. Or I wouldn't have done the big dentry change (which was a total disaster in some peoples minds) in 2.1.x. Or the VM changeover in the middle of 2.4.x. Or a million other things. I do what _I_ think is right for the kernel, and while I tend to poll people and listen to them, when the sh*t hits the fan it is _my_ decision. You can't please everybody. And usually if you _try_ to please everybody, the end result is one big mess. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/