Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756223Ab0BUBzc (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:55:32 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46477 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755658Ab0BUBzb (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2010 20:55:31 -0500 Message-ID: <4B80935E.5040901@redhat.com> Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:58:54 +0800 From: Cong Wang User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091001) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Octavian Purdila CC: David Miller , Linux Kernel Network Developers , Linux Kernel Developers , Neil Horman , Eric Dumazet , "Eric W. Biederman" Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v5 0/3] net: reserve ports for applications using fixed port numbers References: <1266532210-11536-1-git-send-email-opurdila@ixiacom.com> <4B7F993C.9000007@redhat.com> <201002201557.04427.opurdila@ixiacom.com> In-Reply-To: <201002201557.04427.opurdila@ixiacom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1839 Lines: 47 Octavian Purdila wrote: > On Saturday 20 February 2010 10:11:40 you wrote: > >> 2) I hope you could add some documentation to show the relations >> between ip_local_port_range and ip_local_reserved_ports. >> > > How does this sound: > > ip_local_reserved_ports - list of comma separated ranges > Specify the ports which are reserved for known third-party > applications. These ports will not be used by automatic port > assignments (e.g. when calling connect() or bind() with port > number 0). Explicit port allocation behavior is unchanged. > > The format used for both input and output is a comma separated > list of ranges (e.g. "1,2-4,10-10" for ports 1, 2, 3, 4 and > 10). Writing to the file will clear all previously reserved > ports and update the current list with the one given in the > input. > > Note that ip_local_port_range and ip_local_port_range settings > are independent and both are considered by the kernel when > determining which ports are available for automatic port > assignments. > > You can reserve ports which are not in the current > ip_local_port_range, e.g.: > > $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_port_range > 32000 61000 > $ cat /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_local_reserved_ports > 8080,9148 > > although this is redundant. However such a setting is useful > if later the port range is changed to a value that will > include the reserved ports. This looks fine for me. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/