Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S313025AbSDTSlW>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:41:22 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313132AbSDTSlV>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:41:21 -0400
Received: from panic.tn.gatech.edu ([130.207.137.62]:48779 "HELO gtf.org")
	by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id <S313025AbSDTSlU>;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:41:20 -0400
Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 14:41:19 -0400
From: Jeff Garzik <garzik@havoc.gtf.org>
To: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
Cc: Larry McVoy <lm@bitmover.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Message-ID: <20020420144119.A7756@havoc.gtf.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0204201006280.11450-100000@penguin.transmeta.com> <E16ycFR-0000Vg-00@starship> <20020420105125.B29646@work.bitmover.com> <E16yd71-0000X4-00@starship>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 08:27:58PM +0200, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> The missing part is watching the mail go by.  It's the discourse, where
> has it gone?  What happened to the times when patches were actually
> discussed before going into the tree?  Can we somehow have that and
> bitkeeper too... and a fairy castle... 

The level of discussion of my own patches is exactly the same, pre- and
post-BitKeeper.

What patches do you think are being sneaked into the tree?

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/