Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752554Ab0BVJdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:33:31 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:41660 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752220Ab0BVJda (ORCPT ); Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:33:30 -0500 Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2010 20:33:19 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Ingo Molnar Cc: mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, roland@redhat.com, suresh.b.siddha@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, hjl.tools@gmail.com, linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org Subject: linux-next requiements (Was: Re: [tip:x86/ptrace] ptrace: Add support for generic PTRACE_GETREGSET/PTRACE_SETREGSET) Message-Id: <20100222203319.8bd497a2.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20100222090710.GA31357@elte.hu> References: <20100211195614.886724710@sbs-t61.sc.intel.com> <20100222090710.GA31357@elte.hu> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.0 (GTK+ 2.18.7; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Mon__22_Feb_2010_20_33_19_+1100_N5YSiwMVWfv1sCJ0" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1937 Lines: 51 --Signature=_Mon__22_Feb_2010_20_33_19_+1100_N5YSiwMVWfv1sCJ0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Ingo, On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 10:07:10 +0100 Ingo Molnar wrote: > > I'll keep them in tip:master to get them tested, but note that i cannot p= ush=20 > any of these patches into linux-next until this is fixed, as linux-next=20 > requires all architectures to build, with no regard to which architecture= s are=20 > tested by kernel testers in practice. I merely expect people not to push known broken code into linux-next. linux-next breaks on all sorts of architectures all the time (check http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/branch/9/). One of the reasons linux-next exists is so that all kernel developers don't have to build test on all architectures all the time. (And, yes, I know that linux-next doesn't build all architectures or all configs.) That being said, I will complain about breakages on some architectures more than others since they are in my personal builds (as opposed to the over night builds). That being said (:-)), I am sure that the PARISC guys would appreciate the original problem being fixed. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Mon__22_Feb_2010_20_33_19_+1100_N5YSiwMVWfv1sCJ0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkuCT18ACgkQjjKRsyhoI8zvngCeLq6wtpA2Jh85DcFbLMktDgm7 6skAoJfZ+GslAE6f21SCP5Rl2dXzrr/T =oOdT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Mon__22_Feb_2010_20_33_19_+1100_N5YSiwMVWfv1sCJ0-- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/