Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+akpm=40zip.com.au@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S312458AbSDTTnq>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:43:46 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S313163AbSDTTnp>; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:43:45 -0400
Received: from dsl-213-023-039-128.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.39.128]:51083 "EHLO
	starship") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id <S312458AbSDTTno>;
	Sat, 20 Apr 2002 15:43:44 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Remove Bitkeeper documentation from Linux tree
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:43:48 +0200
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2]
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44L.0204201513170.1960-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT
Message-Id: <E16yeIP-0000aD-00@starship>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Saturday 20 April 2002 20:13, you wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> 
> > As always, what I do is in the interest of Linux and freedom.
> 
> Then why do you want to deny us the freedom to have a very
> useful piece of documentation in the kernel tree ?

If I objected to the inclusion of a piece of code licensed under Microsoft's
'shared source' license, whould you also say I was denying your freedom?

-- 
Daniel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/